Liz submitted a new resource:
Earl David Worden Motion In Limine 1986-01-21 – Motion in limine for the 1986 aggravated sexual assault case against Earl David Worden.
Earl David Worden Motion In Limine 1986-01-21 – Motion in limine for the 1986 aggravated sexual assault case against Earl David Worden.
Earl David Worden’s attorney filed this motion in limine to suppress certain facts from being brought up in his 1986 aggravated sexual assault trial, such as the fact he was a suspect in other sexual assault cases and the stolen car he was caught in.
Worden's attorney, Mr. Hardy, may have made a mistake in the motion. Does Hardy mean in the last paragraph to write "admissible" rather than "inadmissible." The prosecutor would be the one wanting the jury to hear the unfounded allegations, the founded but extremely prejudicial allegations, or the dismissed allegations against Worden.]Liz submitted a new resource:
Earl David Worden Motion In Limine 1986-01-21 – Motion in limine for the 1986 aggravated sexual assault case against Earl David Worden.
Read more about this resource…
Continue reading...
First, his attorney was M. Gabriel Nahas, Jr. not "Hardy".Worden's attorney, Mr. Hardy, may have made a mistake in the motion. Does Hardy mean in the last paragraph to write "admissible" rather than "inadmissible." The prosecutor would be the one wanting the jury to hear the unfounded allegations, the founded but extremely prejudicial allegations, or the dismissed allegations against Worden.
Judging by his sudden "absence" from even his channel, I suspect that EDW has been advised by counsel to cease responding to those "attacking" him. He's doing more harm than good in vociferously defending himself in the court of public opinion. As I always told my clients - you have the right to remain silent, so STFU.Earl has a court appearance today, any news?
We'll see how long he can stay quiet. I would bet his attorney advised him to stfu each time they spoke.Judging by his sudden "absence" from even his channel, I suspect that EDW has been advised by counsel to cease responding to those "attacking" him. He's doing more harm than good in vociferously defending himself in the court of public opinion. As I always told my clients - you have the right to remain silent, so STFU.
He's being targeted by the police and Shell. You are on to something with this.This man is obviously targeted by the Texas Police. I myself am dealing with this agency that will stop at nothing to protect their agencies criminal actions from coming to light. I have been stalked, harassed, assaulted, by these criminals for years before being framed, set up, jailed, then upon release stalked again, every single day of my life. Forced to sell home for cash to try to escape this terrorism. Only to have this stalking behavior follow me from Harris county to Galveston and now back to Harris county again.