Yeah, the system of record-keeping back then has improved a great deal with the introduction of computers. Hand written records were a pain and hard to decipher these days.There is one entry that looks to be a 1 day IRR administrative muster in Pasadena, TX. It is unclear if he was physically required to attend or if it was a paperwork only muster.
Yeah, the system of record-keeping back then has improved a great deal with the introduction of computers. Hand written records were a pain and hard to decipher these days.
I believe that would have been an ETS muster to end his Ready Reserve status, which ran from 10/09/82 to 02/12/85. Notice that the entry for 10/09/82 says RCPAC St. Louis. That's the former designation for NPRC (National Personnel Records Center). This means his active duty ended on that date and his records were retired to St. Louis, MO. His Ready Reserve was non-reporting / non-duty, so he had an ETS muster (paper only) to formally discharge him out of Pasadena, TX, since he resided in Texas.
So, for the record EARL - - - (LOL) - - - any "secret intelligence work" done for the Army after active duty would only have been 2 years and 4 months, not 5 or 6 years. At any rate, that would be included in the records which it is not.
That is confusing. By then of course he was already convicted of Agg Sex Assualt. His time is accounted for in the Houston area from his EAS in 82 through 86 when he was convicted the first time. There was no additional actual time in service in my opinion. The second document is more comprehensive as the individual station entries are entered contemporaneously and less prone to errors than the summary which is generated at the time of the FOIA. The only legitimate reason I can think of for the late entry would be if they held him over administratively while the charges were being resolved which isn’t unheard of since they were filed prior to the end of his IRR commitment.Earl's military records (part one) has a second date of service, NOV 29, 1987 listed on it. If he was discharged from his reserve duties in 1985 why would there be a service date for 87. This date is confusing me so any info would be helpful.
That would make sense, Thanks for the response.The only legitimate reason I can think of for the late entry would be if they held him over administratively while the charges were being resolved which isn’t unheard of since they were filed prior to the end of his IRR commitment.